No, but Alexandre Porcelli has various mock-ups available. AFAIK Alexandre is tasked with developing the replacement.
On 19 April 2013 13:03, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Excellent news. Is there a jira ticket describing what Navigator 6.0 will > looks like ? > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> 1) Why have we completely change the Web GUI and disregard the role of >> "Business" End user" loving Guvnor 5.5 in favor of something which is a >> kind of interface for "Developer" ? >> >> It is already accepted that the Project Explorer in 6.0 is a poor >> substitute for the Asset Viewer in 5.5. A new "Navigator" for 6.0.Final is >> on the table. >> >> >> 2) Why have we removed a lot of the features/functionality's proposed by >> Guvnor 5.5 in Guvnor 6.x (import POJO ....) ? >> >> Guvnor 6.0 follows the changes made to Drools Expert 6.0. The previous >> concept of what constituted a "package" has changed completely. >> >> This had led to a change in how POJO models need to be uploaded: >> previously they just had to be on the classpath at build-/run-time; now >> they need to be declared as a project dependency and uploaded to a >> repository. >> >> There is a whole new API for 6.0 for developers using Drools Expert 6.0 >> too. >> >> With kind regards, >> >> Mike >> >> >> On 19 April 2013 08:25, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The new Guvnor Web GUI (6.x) is really disturbing for "Business end >>> user" which are not Developer. >>> >>> Questions : >>> 1) Why have we completely change the Web GUI and disregard the role of >>> "Business" End user" loving Guvnor 5.5 in favor of something which is a >>> kind of interface for "Developer" ? >>> 2) Why have we removed a lot of the features/functionality's proposed by >>> Guvnor 5.5 in Guvnor 6.x (import POJO ....) ? >>> >>> Don't forget that doing this kind of change will impact existing >>> customers, their day to day business with such big change and we should be >>> backward compatible with what was proposed earlier. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
