https://plus.google.com/103145805595719456130/posts/8cuDsNtURXE
:) Mark On 13 Aug 2013, at 15:13, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > > On 13 Aug 2013, at 15:04, nmsundar <sunda...@solartis.net> wrote: > >> @Mark Proctor : >> >> Ok mark , I will move this to user list . >> >> what is the maximum number of rules kb can hold on it ? > There is no maximum - it's what ever your memory and CPU can take. But > largest we'd seen so far in real life was 250K for a medical system. > > Tbh if you are loading 600K rules in about 45seconds, that seems pretty > reasonable to me. Some other commercial systems would not scale to that :) > > Actually thinking about this, we should be asking you to do a public > testimony - "Drools scales to 600K rules for a real production system", let > me know if you can :) > > If you do start profiling (which would be nice if you could) you can ask Qs > about Drools internals here. Or on irc: > http://www.jboss.org/drools/irc > > But further Qs on partitioning, or general "how to" or "What's recommended" > Qs, should be continued on the USER list. > > Mark > >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Reg-Handling-large-number-of-rules-tp4025502p4025519.html >> Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list >> archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >
_______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
