any news?

Mark
On 30 Mar 2014, at 13:38, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote:

> 
> On 30 Mar 2014, at 13:26, kellyajp <kelly...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> I'll get that to you on Monday 
>> 
>> On 30 Mar 2014, at 12:59, "Mark Proctor [via Drools]" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Are you able to isolate what the FH’s are referencing,
> Sorry that should be RT, not FH. RT == RightTuple, FH == FactHandle.
>>> that might give us an idea of where to look. If you look RightTuple’s they 
>>> will have a ‘sink' reference (network node) and that sink will have an 
>>> ‘associates’ map. That map is the rules that node is part of. You can use 
>>> this to identify the offending rule(s), and maybe paste those rules here?
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> On 30 Mar 2014, at 09:03, kellyajp <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> I'll get someone from the team to work on this on Monday. Not sure how 
>>>> easy it will be to isolate but will keep you informed.
>>>> 
>>>> Andy
>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 23:52, "Mark Proctor [via Drools]" <<a 
>>>> href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=4029025&amp;i=0" 
>>>> target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Can you get us a unit test demonstrating this, and we’ll look into it as 
>>>>> a priority. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark 
>>>>> On 28 Mar 2014, at 15:40, kellyajp <<a 
>>>>> href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=4029018&amp;i=0" 
>>>>> target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email]> wrote: 
>>>>> 
>>>>> > We have upgraded from Drools 5 -> Drools 6.01 and when repeating the 
>>>>> > processing in each environment we have very different object counts 
>>>>> > that is 
>>>>> > causing memory to run out on Drools 6: 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Below is an extract from a heap dump 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > In Drools 6 the main objects in the heap are 
>>>>> > 1:       4378006      700480960  org.drools.core.reteoo.RightTuple 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Where as in Drools 5 there are way less objects 
>>>>> > 92:         19022        1826112  org.drools.reteoo.RightTuple 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Has anyone else had any experience of this issue? 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > Thanks 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > 
>>>>> > -- 
>>>>> > View this message in context: 
>>>>> > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010.html
>>>>> > Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list 
>>>>> > archive at Nabble.com. 
>>>>> > _______________________________________________ 
>>>>> > rules-dev mailing list 
>>>>> > <a 
>>>>> > href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=4029018&amp;i=1"
>>>>> >  target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email] 
>>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>>>> rules-dev mailing list 
>>>>> <a 
>>>>> href="x-msg://131/user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&amp;node=4029018&amp;i=2" 
>>>>> target="_top" rel="nofollow" link="external">[hidden email] 
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
>>>>> below:
>>>>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010p4029018.html
>>>>> To unsubscribe from Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1, click here.
>>>>> NAML
>>>> 
>>>> View this message in context: Re: Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1
>>>> Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list 
>>>> archive at Nabble.com.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> [hidden email]
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> rules-dev mailing list 
>>> [hidden email] 
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev 
>>> 
>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion 
>>> below:
>>> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp4029010p4029026.html
>>> To unsubscribe from Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1, click here.
>>> NAML
>> 
>> View this message in context: Re: Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1
>> Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list 
>> archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to