best thing to do is come onto irc, and we can start browsing classes together.
Mark On 16 Aug 2014, at 15:18, Cristiano Gavião <cvgav...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree that should have a consistency. > > but where should we start from ? > > are you able to point me to any resource describing a good setup > workflow using that new stuffs that I can use as base for my own > investigation? > > The examples that I saw until now are using factories. what I can > remember last time I tried 6.x, that factories won't work in osgi, so > they are good candidates to be registered by those activators. > > Cristiano > > On 15-08-2014 13:22, Mark Proctor wrote: >> I think things have evolved organically here. We probably need to do a full >> review, to ensure consistency. >> >> I suspect know one would know the answers, without having to dig in the code >> first. >> >> Mark >> >> On 15 Aug 2014, at 16:02, Cristiano Gavião <cvgav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> has a long time that I don't play with Drools and JBPM source code. This >>> week I was walking through them again and saw a lot of new elements, >>> interfaces and new ways to setup things. >>> >>> I saw that some Blueprint specific annotations and classes were created >>> (kie-aries-blueprint). >>> But the existent osgi activators are still registering some services >>> that seems not be appropriated anymore. at least they are different from >>> the set of elements in blueprint namespace (environment, kmodule, kbase >>> and others ) that I saw. >>> >>> For example, in activator of drools-core we have a >>> KnowledgeBaseFactoryServiceImpl being registered. in drools-compiler we >>> have KnowledgeBuilderFactoryServiceImpl being registered. >>> >>> I can't use blueprint, so I need to figure out what is the best setup >>> workflow for OSGi and get the proper services registered. >>> >>> Question, is the kie-aries-blueprint.xsd reflecting the actual state of >>> kie, drools and jbpm core setup workflow, so I can use it as start point? >>> >>> could someone check that and give me a feedback ? >>> >>> many thanks, >>> >>> Cristiano >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
