Vlad,
I think that for Bill's case, the object structure is flatten already
(what is good for rules). Creating nested objects will actually make it
more difficult to write the rules...
Just my 0.02c
[]s
Edson
Olenin, Vladimir (MOH) wrote:
I guess if you modify the business objects a bit (in quite weird way - I
think it would be rather a shortcut than a solution) you can implement this
kind of logic: you need to swap property (zipcode, age, etc) and 'property
ownner' (Person) objects, so that you'll have:
Person (id)
ZipCode (id, code)
Age (id, age)
Etc
In this case you should be able to write:
Rule X
When
$p: Person($id: id)
(
ZipCode(id == $id, code == "23456")
or ZipCode(id == $id, code == "68590")
)
And
(
Age(id == $id, age < 25)
Or Age(id == $id, age > 34)
)
Then
// do smth using $p
End
Or smth along those lines... Would that work?.....
Vlad
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Zhang
Sent: 19 February 2007 09:14
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Convert logic to DRL rules
Hi Alex,
Thank you for confirming this. Writing such a builder may take us a
lot of time because our business user is used to free style
Pascal-like authoring using quite complex logic. For example,
IF
(
(
(Person.Age > 35 OR Person.Age < 25) AND
(Person.ZipCode =23546 or Person.ZipCode = 68590)
)
and
(
(Person.LastOrderPrice > 300 OR
(Person.TotalOrderNumber > 2)
)
)
OR
(
(
(Person.LastOrderCategory in ("098", "109") ) AND
(Person.ZipCode =74567 or Person.ZipCode = 23765)
)
and
(
(Person.LastOrderPrice > 1000 OR
(Person.TotalOrderNumber > 1)
)
)
...
THEN Person.Status = "KT";
Before I set out to write the builder, I would like to know whether
the new syntax can handle the above logic? Also, where can I find
document for the new syntax?
I am also trying to find some existing open source Java library to
"flatten out" these complex logic - to break these complex logic to
atomic ones that can be handled by Drools. Do you have any
recommendation?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Bill Y.
On 2/19/07, Alexander Varakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We built a Rule Builder which creates drl with all possible
combinations. In any case, drl syntax is not exactly business user
friendly, so having such builder is not a bad idea.
Simple Rule Builder can be implemented as an Excel spreadsheet, which
can be easily parsed using POI library and then drl file produced.
Steven Williams wrote:
Hi Bill,
To implement your rules in 3.0.5 you would need to implement a rule
for each combination of age and zipCode.
$a : Person(age > 35 zipCode == 23546)
then
$a.setStatus("KT");
$a : Person(age < 25, zipCode == 23546 )
then
$a.setStatus("KT");
$a : Person(age > 35, zipCode == 68590)
then
$a.setStatus("KT");
etc..
Steve
On 2/19/07, *Bill Zhang* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
So Alex, if I only want to use the old syntax that is in production,
there is no way to implement my seemingly simple logic conditioning?
Thanks for your help.
On 2/18/07, Alexander Varakin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> As far as I know this syntax is new and is available in SVN
only, you
> will have to wait till 3.1 is released or take source from SVN
and build it.
>
> Bill Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Steven,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your help. Really appreciate.
> >
> > I still got the same error, Unexpected token '|'. I did not
see "|" in
> > the document, only saw "||", which is supposed to be used with
> > columns.
> >
> > Ye
> >
> > On 2/18/07, Steven Williams < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >> Hi Bill,
> >>
> >> I think it should be:
> >>
> >> $a : Person(age > 35 | < 25, zipCode == 23546 | == 68590)
> >>
> >> Edson, Mark or Michael can probably confirm or correct the
above syntax.
> >>
> >> Make sure you are running of the latest trunk.
> >>
> >> cheers
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/18/07, Bill Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I tried:
> >> >
> >> > $a : Person(age > 35 || age < 25, zipCode == 23546 || ==
68590)
> >> >
> >> > Errors:
> >> > org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage : unknown:39:30
> >> Unexpected token '||'
> >> > unknown:39:40 mismatched token:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED],1040:1041='<=',<47>,39:40];
> >> > expecting type '('
> >> > unknown:39:92 mismatched token:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED],1092:1092='<',<46>,39:92];
> >> > expecting type '('
> >> >
> >> > I also tried
> >> >
> >> > $a : Person(age > 35 | age < 25, zipCode == 23546 | == 68590)
> >> >
> >> > Pretty much the same error.
> >> >
> >> > Based on the document, "||" is only valid for columns...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 2/17/07, Bill Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >> > > Thank you Steve. But I got syntax error using the
following.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 2/17/07, Steven Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >> > > > In trunk I think you can use connective constraints:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > $a : Person(age > 35 | < 25, zipCode == 23546 | == 68590)
> >> > > > then
> >> > > > $a.setStatus("KT");
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On 2/18/07, Bill Zhang < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Hello,
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I am a new Drools user trying to convert the
following simple
> >> logic
> >> into
> >> > > > DRL:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > IF (Person.Age > 35 OR Person.Age < 25) AND
(Person.ZipCode =
> >> 23546
> >> or
> >> > > > > Person.ZipCode = 68590)
> >> > > > > THEN
> >> > > > > Person.Status = "KT";
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I found that it is not easy to convert the above
logic into
> >> ONE DRL
> >> rule.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I tried something like this
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > when
> >> > > > > $a: Person(age>35) or Person (age<25)
> >> > > > > $b: Person(Zipcode==23456) or Person (ZipCode == 68590)
> >> > > > > $c: $a and $b
> >> > > > > Then
> >> > > > > $c.setStatus("KT")
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > But looks like I can not use
> >> > > > > $c: $a and $b
> >> > > > > becaue in Drools, you can only bind variable to
column, not
> >> to other
> >> > > > varaibles.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Please advise how to do this. I would imagine this
should be
> >> quite
> >> > > > > simple, maybe I missed something quite obvious.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I know that I can write custom Java method to do
this, but if
> >> I do
> >> > > > > that, I suppose I lose the power of RETEOO pattern
matching
> >> (pattern
> >> > > > resuing,
> >> > > > > etc.). So I prefer not to do that.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > I also understand I can break the above logic into 4
rules
> >> and that
> >> > > > > would be quite easy, but our business user is not used
to
> >> think in
> >> > > > > that way. Also, we have more complex logic than the
above. So
> >> what I
> >> > > > > want is to see if there is a way to convert this
> >> > > > > kind of logic in ONE DRL rule.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thanks in advance.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Bill
> >> > > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > > rules-users mailing list
> >> > > > > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > > >
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > Steven Williams
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Supervising Consultant
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Object Consulting
> >> > > > Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501
> >> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > > > www.objectconsulting.com.au
<http://www.objectconsulting.com.au>
> >> > > >
> >> > > > consulting | development | training | support
> >> > > > our experience makes the difference
> >> > > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > > rules-users mailing list
> >> > > > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > rules-users mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Steven Williams
> >>
> >> Supervising Consultant
> >>
> >> Object Consulting
> >> Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> www.objectconsulting.com.au
<http://www.objectconsulting.com.au>
> >>
> >> consulting | development | training | support
> >> our experience makes the difference
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Steven Williams
Supervising Consultant
Object Consulting
Office: 8615 4500 Mob: 0439 898 668 Fax: 8615 4501
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www.objectconsulting.com.au <http://www.objectconsulting.com.au>
consulting | development | training | support
our experience makes the difference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
--
Edson Tirelli
Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
Office: +55 11 3124-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9218-4151
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users