I'm just finalising M2, doing lots of testing here, I think it may even
be more stable than 3.0.6 :) Deadline for final is now end of june.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Is there a Milestone release that I can use now that contains this change?
On 4/11/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
What is the timeline for the new release as I might be able to
migrate now prior to an official rollout of my product/project.
On 4/11/07, *Mark Proctor* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
in trunk you can do:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty,
sumCmAndRnr != $amt1)
So you'll have to wait till you upgrade to drop the eval.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Here is a question though now, I have the following:
mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 :
sumCmAndRnr)
eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())
Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it
makes the rules engine sub-optimal? I guess one strategy is
to create two separate classes to house the results, but man
that seems messy.
On 4/11/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Michael,
I got it working, but using Salience alone.
Thanks!
Ron
On 4/10/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango * <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
Michael,
OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I
have into words:
Step 1: Sum ObjectA
Step 2: Sum ObjectB
Step 3: Sum ObjectC
Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and
do something if it fails
Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from
Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it fails
Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from
Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it fails
I literally need it in this order and I was thinking
that agenda groups along with salience could get me
there, but I have never used them before.
Does that help?
Ron
On 4/6/07, *Michael Rhoden* <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Please give a better example or some pseudo code
of what you are trying to do.
-Michael
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] *On
Behalf Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
*Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
*To:* Rules Users List
*Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
All,
I have a rules design question for the
community. I have 3 lists of different types of
objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute
is present on each one of them. Then after the
summing has taken place execute other rules based
upon the results of the summation.
Is there a way that I can accomplish this via
salience or agenda groups?
Thanks in advance,
Ron
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
