Hi Mark, Thanks, these is good news! My product is planned to be GA in 4-5 months. When do you recommend shifting from 3.0.1 (that's the version I currently use) to 3.1? When do you expect 3.1 to be a stable version?
Best regards, Einat On 4/12/07, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just finalising the last bit, so any day now. with any luck over the weekend or monday. Mark Einat Idan wrote: Michael, Thanks for your reply. When is the next milestone expected? On 4/12/07, Michael Neale <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > definately upgrade to latest 3.0.x version (3.0.6). > > Also, those methods are were most of the work happens, its a common > misconception that all the work happens lazily when you call "fire all > rules" but that is not the case, as you assert each object, it propagates > through the RETE network, so that is normal to see the time spent there for > lots of data. > > you can also try the trunk version if you like, its certainly got some > improvements, but the next milestone (if you can wait) will be more worth > your time. > > Michael. > > On 4/12/07, Einat Idan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I encountered a serious performance problem using Jboss Rules 3.0.1. > > The process was executed on a pretty strong machine - a DL350 4 cpu RedHat > > machine. The process was using about 100% CPU and I used a profiler to see > > what's going on: > > > > My application adds/removes objects to/from the working memory of a > > stateful rule session quite intensively (2000-3000 per sec), though the > > intensive actions were related to a single rule session and only a few extra > > rule sessions existed simultaneously. It turned out that about 7-10% of CPU > > was consumed per a single add/remove operation. More specifically, > > ReteooWorkingMemory.doRetract() and ReteooWorkingMemory.doAssertObject() > > were the major consumers. I would expect a basic operation like this to be > > significantly less CPU intensive. > > > > Would you please provide more information, is my benchmark too > > ambitious? Do you recommend an upgrade to version 3.0.6? 3.1? If so, > > please elaborate what were the performance improvements. > > > > Best regards, > > Einat Idan > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
