The 'in' operator is just sugar for == 'stilton' || == 'brie' but we
felt it improved the declarative nature of the language sufficiently to
warrant the sugar.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Nice; an in operator just like SQL :-)
On 7/7/07, *Mark Proctor* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Sorry it's now && and ||
You can also us the 'in' operator
Cheese( type in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type not in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
Cheese( type memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Cheese( type not memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
Answered my own question:
MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
On 7/7/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
All,
If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you
were adding an or type syntax where you could compare a value
against multiple values. What is the new syntax for it?
I am looking to do something logically like:
MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
Ron
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
<https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
