Yes, there should be no noticeable runtime perf impact. []s Edson
2007/9/24, ekke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > do import statements have any impact on the performance of a .drl or .rfm > ? > > I plan to make some templates (.drl and .rfm) to use by the business guys > - > from my UML model I know which entities were used from which Services, > so I can pre-configure a .drl/.rfm for each service (= drool package) and > its easier for the business guys to create Rules. they know that there are > orders, offers, addresses etc. but they have no knowledge about java > package > structures > > but then it will be that there are many unused import statements - I think > this would create no runtime - performance issues. am I right ? > > and then I've noticed that Drools supports import a.b.c.* which means all > classes from package a.b.c were known, but not from subpackages like > a.b.c.d.e. there's nothing in the docs - so I obly want to confirm that > this > is right. (inside the BRMS I noticed that .* was not supported with import > statements) > > thanks for info > > ekke > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/import-statements-and-performance-tf4511270.html#a12866596 > Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
