thanks mark. -Krishnan. On 9/26/07, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We aren't lawyers, so can't offer legal advice. But all the libraries we > use have compatible licenses, i.e. are not GPL etc. We do allow LGPL. > > Mark > Krishnan wrote: > > > hi, > > I am trying to use drools 4.0 for our project and understand the licensing > agreement for drools. Drools > uses Apache license where as some of the dependant libraries use New BSD > and other type of licenses. > Since I am not a lawyer, does anybody have any idea of any implications on > any problems related to > the licenses ?. > > Drools use the following libraries > > antlr-runtime-3.0.jar > core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar > janino-2.5.7.jar > jsr94-1.1.jar > jxl-2.4.2.jar > mvel14-1.2rc1.jar > xercesImpl-2.4.0.jar > xml-apis-1.0.b2.jar > xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar > xstream-1.1.3.jar > > (a) Do you guys have the licensing agreement for each of these jars ? > (b) Also, I tried searching for the websites using their name but some of > them I am not able to find. IF you > have the website information for these jars, that will help. > (c) Has anybody run into any particular licensing issue problem with > Drools ?. > > Any help is appreciated. > > Thanks, > Krishnan. > > > -- > Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand) > > Never assume the obvious is true. > - William Safire > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
-- Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand) Never assume the obvious is true. - William Safire
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
