Thanks - consider supporting it for efficiency. (Otherwise, removing a set of facts from working memory requires a temporary container to hold the facts to be removed.)
- Godmar On 10/5/07, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Godmar Back wrote: > > Does the iterator returned by WorkingMemory.iterator support remove()? > > > > I checked the javadoc and the Drools manual, but may have missed it. > > > If you try it you'll get an exception thrown "UnsupportedOperationException" > http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/util/JavaIteratorAdapter.java > > Please answer and augment documentation. > > > > - Godmar > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
