tried it for several hours, but hadn't success to get it running ...
2007/10/17, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul Browne wrote: > > Haven't tried it in this context , but would using Retroweaver help > > ?(Java 5 code compiled to work in Java 1.4 JVM) > It may do, but we don't have the resources to QA this, so its up to the > community to see if that works. > > > > Mark Proctor wrote: > >> Markus Helbig wrote: > >>> that's a real pitty ... it's a great thing ... but WebSphere 6.0.x is > >>> using JRE 1.4 ... damned > >>> > >> There are still people out there using drools 2.x because they are on > >> JDK1.3. But their comes a time when the advantages of moving > >> outweight the advantages of staying, its not an easy decision but > >> jdk1.4 has been around since 2003, so I think we've supported it long > >> enough. Our next major release will be jdk1.5 only, both BRMS and > >> engine. > >>> 2007/10/15, Mark Proctor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>> > >>>> Markus Helbig wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> i tryed to deploy the BRMS on a WebSphere Server, but i get > >>>>> incompatibility errors. It seems BRMS can not be used with JRE 1.4.x, > >>>>> right? Why? JRE 1.4.x is still very common and often used in > >>>>> enterprises ... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> yup the BRMS is JDK1.5 - welcome to the future :) > >>>> > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> > >>>>> Markus > >>>>> > >>>>> Stacktrace is: > >>>>> > >>>>> Could not be defined due to: (org/jboss/seam/servlet/SeamListener) > >>>>> bad > >>>>> major version at offset=6 > >>>>> This is often caused by having a class defined at multiple > >>>>> locations within the classloader hierarchy. Other potential causes > >>>>> include compiling against an older or newer version of the class > >>>>> that has an incompatible method signature. > >>>>> Dumping the current context classloader hierarchy: > >>>>> ==> indicates defining classloader > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> rules-users mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> rules-users mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >>>> > >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> rules-users mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >>> > >>> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> rules-users mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
