Thank U again Kris. I Think I misunderstood How a ruleflow works... for "parallelism" I meant two rules that are activated in the same time but I know that it is a non-sense cause the ruleflow itself remove any ambiguity concerning the agenda.
Sorry about that! Hopefully next time I will post something a bit more interesting.... :( ;-) Thank You again! massi On Nov 23, 2007 12:22 AM, Kris Verlaenen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Massi, > > Why do you want to use a ruleflow? If you simply remove the > ruleflow-group statements from your rule definitions, you will get your > expected behaviour, as rule_ab will execute first, updating your user fact, > which will then trigger rule_ba to execute, updating the user fact again, > which will trigger rule_ba again, etc. > > I'm not sure where you see any parallelism here, as it is always the first > rule, then the second, then the first one again, etc. > > But if you really want to know, you can create a loop in a ruleflow by > putting whatever you would like to see repeated in between an XOR-join in > front and an XOR-split at the end, and linking one of the outgoing > connections of the XOR-split back to the first join :) > > Kris > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* mmquelo massi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* Rules Users List <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 22, 2007 5:15 PM > *Subject:* [rules-users] How to make a "Loop-Ruleflow"???? > > Hi everybody. > > I am trying to make a ruleflow that, once processed, causes the rule > engine to infinitely loop. > I have got a *User* Object in my object model. It has got a *getLogin()*and > *setLogin(*) methods. > > The login field stands for the "User name", so it is a String. > > First I insert an Object in the WM, with login==A. > > Then I generate the following rule-flow-groups: > > *rule "rule_ab" * > * ruleflow-group "ab" * > * when * > * u:User( login == "A" ) * > * then * > * u.setLogin("B"); * > * System.out.println("a - > b"); * > * update(u); * > *end * > ** > *rule "rule_ba" * > * ruleflow-group "ba" * > * when * > * u:User( login == "B" ) * > * then * > * u.setLogin("A"); * > * System.out.println("b - > a"); * > * update(u); * > *end * > > I'd like to define a ruleflow that gives me in output something like this: > > a - > b > b - > a > a - > b > b - > a a - > b > b - > a > a - > b > b - > a a - > b > b - > a > a - > b > b - > a > .... looping... > > How can I do it? > > In other words I want those rules to be executed in parallel and I want to > define > this "parallelism" using the ruleflow graph, Is It Possible??? > > Thank You Again! > > Massi. > > P.S. > > Ah.... I solved that matter with the rule.package... > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
