Hi Michael,
Thanks but we would like to reuse the ServiceImplementation but I can't
pass the RulesRepository to another class. I was hoping to use the In
annotation on a constructor so I can pass in the RulesRepository that
way but Seam doesn't allow that.
//@In
//public RulesRepository repository = null;
private RulesRepository repository = null;
//@In
public ServiceImplementation( RulesRepository repository )
{
this.repository = repository;
this.serviceImplementation = new BRMSServiceImplementation(
this.repository );
}
No quick fix :-( I guess I'll have to read up on Seam.
Thanks for your help,
Len
________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 8:50 PM
To: Rules Users List
Cc: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] BRMS
Hi len. Yes I think if you create you own in annotation and if you
recompile that may work. If not recompiling, I am not sure. But if you
hack source, we could refactor so the seam stuff is not in the main
class. Another approach is to have the brms as a self contained war, and
have the service called remotely via the repository service interface
(in effect what the web bit does anyway)- that could work better if you
don't need to get at the innards. Do you need it embedded in you app ?
If so, will need to think some more if you dont want to use seam
(basically means refacting in to a separate module the back end bits)
Sent from my iPhone
On 08/02/2008, at 16:09, "Carlsen, Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at the Drools BRMS to see how I can reuse the
org.drools.brms.server.ServiceImplementation for other UI toolkits and
also be able to create my own meta-data. So, I created a plain
BRMSServiceImplementation and removed Seam and GWT from several other
classes and re-wrote the org.drools.brms.server.ServiceImplementation to
use BRMSServiceImplementation so the BRMS still works but I am having
problems with Seam org.jboss.seam.annotations.In annotation since my
BRMSServiceImplementation class uses the ServiceImplementation's
RulesRepository.
I don't know much about Seam and am wondering if anyone knows if
the @In annotation can be replaced (with another annotation???) and set
to the constructor instead of a class member variable?
@Name("org.drools.brms.client.rpc.RepositoryService")
@AutoCreate
public class ServiceImplementation
implements
RepositoryService {
@In
public RulesRepository repository;
Replace with public ServiceImplementation( RulesRepository
repository )
If I can get this to work, I'd be happy to submit it to Drools.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Len
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
