Edson -

Thanks, this is EXACTLY what I was looking for...

-tk


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 24, Issue 48
------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:02:36 -0500
From: "Edson Tirelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Upgrading from 3.x to 4.0.7
To: "Rules Users List" <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

   Following API call (or equivalent property conf) will make Drools 4
behave like Drools 3.

   RuleBaseConfiguration.setRemoveIdentities( true );

   []s
   Edson

2008/11/12 Knych, Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Hi -
>
> I'm upgrading a large base of rules from 3.x to 4.0.7. However there 
> seem to be a few semantic differences. I have rules like the below in 
> a few places:
>
> rule "All items should have a unique external id"
>      when
>                new_item : Item( exId : externalId )
>                    old_item : Item( externalId == exId )
>        then
>                LOG.warn( "DUPE Detected: new:" +  new_item + " old:" +

> old_item );
>                retract( new_item );
> end
>
> And this all worked fine because 3.x would never assign the same 
> object to both new_item and old_item. I know my new/old seem arbitary 
> - but I'm just getting down to the minimal reproducing case. 4.x now 
> will assign one instance of an object to both new_item and old_item. 
> Is there any way to disable this behaviour?
>
>
> thanks,
> -Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



--
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20081113/e9898c
06/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to