Costello, Robert wrote:
Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a
default package? I'm trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule
which compiled nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with
a default package.
The error is "foo" cannot be resolved to a type
I've tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it
in a named package, and neither seem to work. If I put my objects
back into packages, everything is fine.
Any advice?
I'm not sure the Drools type resolver works with default namespace
classes or rules.
Thanks,
Robert Costello
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
