Yes, JBRULES-1611. I just fixed this and committed to revision #25650. It will be in the next release.
[]s Edson 2009/3/14 Mark Proctor <[email protected]> > Garrett Conaty wrote: > > I've got an odd parse case that I'm hoping the parser wizards could confirm > is the same as the bug JBRULES-1611: > > This works > > not (exists (Event(eval > (eventDate.after(CalendarUtil.getDateDaysPast(30)))) from $room.events)) > > > but this doesn't > > forall( Event(eval (eventDate.before(CalendarUtil.getDateDaysPast(30)))) > from $room.events ) > > It's like doing math proofs all over again. Technically I think I've got > to fix the logic because !< is >-= rather than >. > > I believe there is already a JIIRA for saying that 'from' doesn't work with > 'forall' > > > Thanks, > Garrett > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing > [email protected]https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
