Wolfgang is right in its suggestion. Just to explain what the problem is, in previous versions of drools, forall() could not be used with an embedded from. It is fixed in trunk.
[]s Edson 2009/3/20 Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> > You don't need forall to solve your problem. The following rule prints all > patient names which don't have problem 4711; omitting the 'not' prints > those suffering from Colognitis. > > rule lookJoe > when > $patient: Patient() > not ( Problem( code == "4711" ) from $patient.problemList ) > then > System.out.println( $patient.getName() ); > end > > 'not' implies quantification (or exhaustive search over the domain). > Without 'not' also searches all Problem entries of the current Patient > so it would fire again if the patient has a problem stored more than > once. > > -W > > 2009/3/20 howard goldberg <[email protected]> > >> Trying to check whether a patient has a particular problem on their >> problem list: >> >> when >> >> $patient : Patient() >> forall ( Problem( code != "195967001") from $patient.problemList) >> >> but I get the following parsing error-- >> >> [29,41]: [ERR 101] Line 29:41 mismatched input 'FROM' expecting ')' in >> rule "Dumb no asthma Rule" >> [29,66]: [ERR 101] Line 29:66 mismatched input ')' expecting '(' in rule >> "Dumb no asthma Rule" in pattern $patient.problemList >> >> What is the correct way to check for this condition? >> >> Thanks, >> Howard >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- Edson Tirelli JBoss Drools Core Development JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
