Thanks for trying this for me... As it turns out, while I was creating a test sample for you I realized that my ruleflow was not loading properly and I forgot to check for errors on the builder. Now it works.
Still, the behavior is strange. If my rule doesn't load and even though my DRL loaded, my globals were not available. Since the DRL declared the same globals it should not have given me that error. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Kris Verlaenen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 5:51 PM To: Rules Users List; Malenfant, Andre Cc: Rules Users List Subject: Re: [rules-users] Globals in ruleflow Andre, There should be no problem in using the same global in both your rules and processes. I have tried a simple example as you described but have not been able to reproduce the problem. Could you send me a self-contained example that shows the issue? Kris Quoting "Malenfant, Andre" <[email protected]>: > I am experimenting with rule flows and I get the following error: > > Unexpected global [myglobal] > > When calling setGlobal on the session. > > This code works without the workflow (globals declared in the drl) > but > fails when I include the rule flow. I declared the same globals in > the > rule flow in the header section. > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
