|
I am using the last version of drools fusion , what I wanted to achieve is to pack the rules in one "statement" , i.e : Event(this after $b && $b after $a) instead of Event(this after $b) Event(this after $a) that's because I am not limited to the sequence operator , for example when I want to make a disjunction rule : Cmplx1 :- a OR b I can't separate the events , but I must write them packed like this :: Event(this after $b || $b after this) One more question : I assume that the relation between the different statements in a rule is normal conjunction , i.e : rule "some rule" when a : ... b : ... c : ... then trigger action "act" end would be equivalent to :: act :- a,b,c . I hope I am correct ? Thanks, Khalil Hafsi |
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
