Kris Verlaenen wrote: > >> 3. Is Flow based on its own PVM or jBPM PVM? Is it also possible to >> extend flow with new flow constructs? > It is based on a generic process engine. We offer a set of core > constructs but this is extensible (for example, to support OSWorkflow > migration, a custom node was added to our language to simplify this > translation). >
Thank you Kris! And is it possible to extend it without changing the drools code itself. Something like WorkItemHandler? JBPM is the only I have seen so far, where this is possible and I have used it.. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Flow-tp25567961p25613619.html Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
