I see a few posts from you Chris on 9/25 and one more from yesterday. Probably 
more, but I emptied my folder a few days before that. If it's an all-or-none 
thing, I can confirm I've received posts daily for the last week. 


- Jeremy 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Edson Tirelli" <[email protected]> 
To: "Rules Users List" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 3:27:50 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central 
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Understanding Fusion temporal reasoning 

Talking just about myself, I was kicked off the list (too many bounces it said) 
and I noticed yesterday, so I lost all messages in the last week or so. Edson 
2009/9/29 Chris Richmond > Ok..will do. > > > > BTW…is the newgroup problem 
happening again? I posted this question about > 3 times over the last week as 
well as some others, and I don’t mind that > people can’t help all the time at 
all, but I know there was a problem before > and I posted this again today 
because iI never received any responses for > like a week and that doesn’t 
happen, usuallly someone mentions something. > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > 
------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] 
[mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Edson Tirelli > 
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 29, 2009 9:21 AM > *To:* Rules Users List > 
*Subject:* Re: [rules-users] Understanding Fusion temporal reasoning > > > > > 
Chris, > > Someone found a bug a couple days ago that might be affecting you 
too. > What happens if you write: > > declare NumReading > > @role( event ) > > 
@expires( 10s ) > > end > > > ? > > Edson > > 2009/9/29 Chris Richmond > > 
Hello, > > > > I am trying to make a rule to delay firing until a certain 
amount of time > has passed without another event being received. I have set up 
a loop that > goes every 10 seconds in my main application that takes readings 
and injects > them into the ReadingStream. These are like sensor readings. > > 
> > I have a thread started at initialization that is basically calling > 
fireUntilHalt() and I never call halt until shutdown, and that seams to be > 
working fine. > > > > So basically any time an out of spec reading in my 
Reading object (<15) is > received, I want to wait to see if a FollowUpReading 
is not received in the > next 5 seconds, before I fire the results(The second 
rule below). The first > rule is there just to verify I am indeed detecting 
NumReadings with values < > 15 being injected and that works fine. Now at this 
point in my appication > I am **never** inserting a FollowUpReading 
object/event, so I would expect > the 2nd rule to fire all the time, however 
the strange thing is that it > only fires the first time I receive a reading 
out of spec. I see rule one > fire, then the seond time, but after that any 
subsequent out of spec > readings received(I know they are out of spec, because 
rule 1 still fires > when received) but rule 2 never fires again. It only ever 
fires one time! > This is very confusing. These ar the only 2 rules and the 
only two object > types being inserted to the stream. Know that rule 2 **can** 
fire because > it does once and only once. Why won’t it fire beyond the first 
time, even > though I never insert the FollowUpReading() ? > > > > Thanks, > > 
> Chris > > > > declare NumReading > > @role( event ) > > end > > > > declare 
FollowUpReading > > @role(event) > > end > > > > > > rule "Determine out of 
spec reading" > > when > > $n : NumReading($r:reading < 15) from entry-point 
"ReadingStream"; > > then > > System.err.println("Fire off a follow up reading 
for device: " + $n); > > end > > > > > > rule "Missed degrading confirmation 
reading" > > when > > $n : NumReading($r:reading < 15) from entry-point 
"ReadingStream"; > > not (FollowUpReading(this after[0s, 5s] $n)) > > then > > 
System.err.println("No good reading received for: " + $n); > > end > > > > > > 
> _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > 
[email protected] > 
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > 
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list 
[email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to