You probably need to use the timer instance id, not the timer id (as this one is only used to differentiate between timers if you have more than one timer defined on the same node and you want to link different actions to each of these timers). So could it be as simple as using ti.getId() instead of ti.getTimerId() ?
Kris Quoting [email protected]: > Hi there! > I'm using Drools 5.1.SNAPSHOT. > I want to disable some timer nodes in my ruleflow, so that they will > not trigger anymore. therefore I tried the following code: > > Collection<TimerInstance> tcoll = > drools.getWorkingMemory().getTimerManager().getTimers(); > > for (TimerInstance ti : tcoll) > { > drools.getWorkingMemory().getTimerManager().cancelTimer(ti.getTimerId()); > } > > OK, so far so good. The code above doesn't work, because > ti.getTimerId() always returns 0. Anyone an idea why this value is 0? > As I've seen in the sources this field is set to an value > 0. this > value is then incremented when you add another timerinstance. > > Thanks in advance! hope anyone can help. > > tom > -- > Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla > Firefox 3.5 - > sicherer, schneller und einfacher! > http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
