Thanks for the information. Glad...we can atleast pass the object references to the functions!
David Sinclair-2 wrote: > > No this is not currently possible. Functions are generated without regard > to > any particular rule, i.e. functions don't know what bind variables you > have > in rules. Generating a function/class to include all bind variables would > be > possible, but probably not make a lot of sense. > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:54 PM, HonorGod < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I have defined functions in my decision table. I wanted to access my >> instance >> variables inside functions without actually passing them as parameters. >> Is >> this possible? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://n3.nabble.com/Accessing-instance-variables-of-the-fact-inside-functions-in-decision-tables-tp108739p108739.html >> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Accessing-instance-variables-of-the-fact-inside-functions-in-decision-tables-tp108739p109894.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
