We are agree on that? On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Mauricio Salatino <sala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> By the way, > Wait States are Node Instances, that are currently inside the > ProcessInstance. Right? > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Mauricio Salatino <sala...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Did you see the new BPMN2 spec? >> There is now such thing as a Generic Wait State. >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:26 PM, tolitius <webaka...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Mauricio, >>> >>> getThePersonAndTheDocumentThatIWant is a business concern. >>> Specifically >>> it relates to Documents and People >>> >>> my argument is that API such as: >>> >>> process.findWorkitemsInWaitState (maybe a bit better worded) is a >>> framework concern, since a WAIT_STATE and a WORK_ITEM are workflow [not >>> necessarily Drools ] DSL. Not business. Do you see what I mean? >>> >>> I don't see me not following your suggestions, and I appreciate the >>> discussion, I just don't understand why the WAIT_STATE is not a framework >>> concern. >>> >>> /Anatoly >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WORKITEM-ID-tp607507p693855.html >>> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> - http://salaboy.wordpress.com >> - http://www.jbug.com.ar >> - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio - >> > > > > -- > - http://salaboy.wordpress.com > - http://www.jbug.com.ar > - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio - > -- - http://salaboy.wordpress.com - http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
