Kris Verlaenen wrote:
> 
> It is trivial to simply create an AbstractWorkItemHandler that would
> transform a Java exception to a process fault with the same name
> 
> ...But if we build this into the framework, it will be more difficult to
> change it if you don't 
> want this behaviour (and we try to keep the maximum flexibility possible).
> 
> Kris
> 

Seems like a perfectly solid default behaviour to me. Features like this one
are usually done (changed only if needed) via configuration.

"Convention Over Configuration" applies to Java frameworks as well :)
/Anatoly

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n3.nabble.com/How-to-do-Exception-Handling-tp689387p713670.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to