Drooks ORs are not short circuited. They are treated individually. You could rewrite the rule to check for the "other part of the or"
( TblVersichKlinik(versicherung != null, versicherung != " ", zusatzversicherung == null) or (TblVersichKlinik(zusatzversicherung !=null, zusatzversicherung != " ", versicherung == null)) ) On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, skasab2s <[email protected]>wrote: > > Hello, > > we are using Drools Expert. We have a rule which should fire if at least > one > of the object attributes are not empty. This is my pattern: > > ( TblVersichKlinik(versicherung != null, versicherung != " ") > or > (TblVersichKlinik(zusatzversicherung !=null, zusatzversicherung != " ")) ) > > The problem is the following: when BOTH conditions are fulfilled, the rule > fires twice, so I get redundant results in my final result, and this is not > wanted. > > Is there a way to solve the problem? Any ideas ? > > Thanks a lot and many regards! > > skasab2s > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Problems-with-OR-tp905689p905689.html > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
