I probably missed quite a few emails on the mailing list lately (sorry), but what's the exact problem with timers and persistence (and does it still exist in the latest trunk, as I know various improvements / bug fixes have been applied in the last few weeks as well)?
There's a simple test that shows the use of timers and persistence together: testPersistenceTimer() in http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-persistence-jpa/src/test/java/org/drools/persistence/session/PersistentStatefulSessionTest.java If you are having issues, please let me know (and if possible provide a test case like the one above that shows this behaviour ;)) and I'll take a look. Kris ----- Original Message ----- From: "nanic23" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:33 PM Subject: Re: [rules-users] Timers' Week :) > > Hi retov, > > Given that the timers do not work when using persistence I haven't been > able > to test the scenario you described. I did test timer behavior when an > exception is thrown from within the workItemHandler that has a timer > attached to it. And in this case the timer keeps working, that is, it does > not stop if you exit workItemHandler abnormally. But remember, this is > without persistence enabled. > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Timers-Week-tp912807p984236.html > Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
