I thought about adding that, but I feel like we would just be
reimplementing java, in this case. So, if you need anything else other than
simple java beans, you should implement it as a java class.
Regarding the constructor, I might still add a constructor that receives
all fields as parameters, just to reduce verbosity when using the java
dialect, but if you are using mvel dialect, you can use "with":
rule ...
when ...
then
with( person = new Person() ) {
name = "Bob",
age = 35
}
insert( person );
end
Edson
2010/8/9 Tina Vießmann <[email protected]>
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to define a function/constructor inside a fact type
> declaration? If yes, how can it be done?
>
> Thank you :)
> Tina
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
