Can't you avoid using ChainedProperties, what is it? Can you send piece of code where you create session?
Pavel 2010/8/10 David Conde <[email protected]>: > Hi Pavel, > I've changed it over to use a stateless session and I'm seeing the > same behavior. I've done some debugging and it seems to be very slow loading > up the SessionConfiguration due to all of the loading that happens in > ChainedProperties. > Thanks, > Dave > > On 10 August 2010 13:53, Pavel Tavoda <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Interesting. Normally it should be fast. Try to change your patter and >> load binary compiled serialized package from disk. You can find it in >> documentation. >> Also consider using stateless session. Do you really need stateful >> session? >> >> Pavel >> >> 2010/8/9 David Conde <[email protected]>: >> > Is it possible that this might be invoking the compiler when a session >> > is >> > created? I have all of the init code in the service start call and >> > stored as >> > members of the service for reuse but I must create a new knowledge >> > session >> > for each run. >> > Any ideas? >> > Thanks, >> > Dave >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: David Conde <[email protected]> >> > Date: 9 August 2010 11:17 >> > Subject: Re: [rules-users] CPU Spike creating a StatefulKnowledgeSession >> > using OSGi >> > To: Rules Users List <[email protected]> >> > >> > >> > The line that it spikes on is StatefulKnowledgeSession ksession = >> > kbase.newStatefulKnowledgeSession();. >> > Cheers, >> > Dave >> > >> > On 9 August 2010 11:09, Pavel Tavoda <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Is it session creation or rule compilation? >> >> >> >> Pavel >> >> >> >> 2010/8/9 David Conde <[email protected]>: >> >> > Good Morning, >> >> > I now have drools running on the Spring DM-Server but I am seeing a >> >> > CPU >> >> > spike when creating a StatefulKnowledgeSession. I've tested this >> >> > outside >> >> > of >> >> > an OSGi environment and I don't see the spike. Does anyone know any >> >> > settings >> >> > that I can change that might make this go away? >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Dave >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > David Conde >> >> > CTO Calom Technologies >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > rules-users mailing list >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> rules-users mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > rules-users mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
