Paul, Don't know whether it's relevant or not, but we experienced problems when the id of a Drools Flow process (i.e. the id attribute in the root node of the .rf file) contained a hyphen. This seemed to screw up the classes auto-generated by Drools. We now mandate a naming scheme for process ids like Java package names (e.g. "com.company.process" etc.).
Alan Tessella plc 26 The Quadrant, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 3YS E: alan.gai...@tessella.com, T: +44 (0)1235 555511, F: +44 (0)1235 553301 www.tessella.com Registered in England No. 1466429 This message is commercial in confidence and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please inform the sender immediately. Please note that messages sent or received by the Tessella e-mail system may be monitored and stored in an information retrieval system. paulB <paul.bor...@sironahealth.com> Sent by: rules-users-boun...@lists.jboss.org 13/08/2010 13:38 Please respond to Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org> To rules-users@lists.jboss.org cc Subject Re: [rules-users] Drools Flow inconsistancies Thanks, salaboy. Looks like it comes down to the compiled classes like "mycompany.edi.Process_mycompany_edi_0ReturnValueEvaluator0Invoker". Anybody know what compiles those or what might throw a wrench into those? Or does anyone know how I can debug them or view the source? -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Flow-inconsistancies-tp1111862p1131582.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
