Done, for this one and for the NPE in the (invalid) update call. -W On 5 November 2010 14:58, Edson Tirelli <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wolfgang, > > It seems you are doing a great QA job all around Drools. Thanks. > > Can you open JIRA's for this and the other quirks you've been > finding? We will work on them as we approach the release date. > > Thanks a lot, > Edson > > 2010/11/4 Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]>: > > The .drl: > > > > declare Leave > > @role( event ) > > @timestamp( timestamp ) > > end > > > > rule "XXX Leave not !=" > > when > > $leave: Leave() > > not Leave( this != $leave ) > > then > > System.out.println( "XXX only one Leave - not !=" ); > > end > > > > rule "YYY Leave not after" > > when > > $leave: Leave() > > not Leave( this before $leave ) > > then > > System.out.println( "YYY only one Leave - not before" ); > > end > > > > > > A) The pseudo-clock is advanced according to the timestamp; then > > exactly one event Leave is inserted; then fireAllRules() is called. > > > > 1) Running in CLOUD mode, both rules fire. > > 2) But running in STREAM mode, ONLY rule XXX fires. > > > > B) Like A, but the session clock is advanced by (at least) 1ms > > prior to calling fireAllRules(). > > > > 3) Either mode, both rules fire. > > > > I think that A2) is incorrect; why should passing another msec change the > > logic? > > > > JIRA? > > > > Wolfgang > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > > -- > Edson Tirelli > JBoss Drools Core Development > JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
