When I asked this question, I meant I don't want to use any frameworks or application servers. But for now I think I should consider to use jBoss or such to manage cross session tx.
I'll take look at this Spring's implementation, because I think there should be an independent implementation in Drools to use non-jta when making persistence. Thank you. 2010/11/16, Anatoly <[email protected]>: > if you use Spring, you can just use > "org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager" with non-XA > transactions: > http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Exception-using-persistence-tp856774p863641.html > > /Anatoly > > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Kris Verlaenen < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, we made the transaction manager pluggable, with a default >> implementation for JTA and Spring. You can take a look at the >> drools-persistence-jpa module, there is a >> org.drools.persistence.session.TransactionManager, that is the interface >> you would have to implement, with the >> org.drools.persistence.session.JtaTransactionManager as a sample >> implementation. >> >> Kris >> >> Quoting Rui Tang <[email protected]>: >> >> > Hi list, >> > >> > According to the documents and some test cases, I found that Drools >> > Flow >> > persistence examples have to work with JTA to enable transaction >> > management. >> > >> > Is there some way to not use JTA as my transaction manager? >> > >> > -- >> > å” ç ¿ >> > >> >> >> >> >> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > -- 从我的移动设备发送 唐睿 _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
