I would try two different layouts and see what happens to memory usage. I
think the rules that use "in" will be faster than the standard matches
implementation.
rule "1.in"
when
$c_0 : CFRO( fi.co in ("1","2","3","4","5"), su.co == "P", c.co == "C")
then
Bcf fact = new Bcf ();
fact.setC( "123");
insert( fact);
end
rule "1.matches"
when
$c_0 : CFRO( fi.co matches "(1|2|3|4|5)", su.co == "P", c.co == "C")
then
Bcf fact = new Bcf ();
fact.setC( "123");
insert( fact);
end
Regards,
Jared Davis
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Memory-Consumption-with-5000-Rules-tp2060449p2061395.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
