No, sorry. The I is a workaround, but people should be cautiioned not to rely on it for the future. -W
2011/1/10 Tihomir Surdilovic <[email protected]> > Hi Wolfgang, good points, thus I asked for a Jira so we can add proper > support for it. > If you know of a better workaround with whats currently available let us > know. > > Thanks. > > > On 1/10/11 10:13 AM, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > > I would not use I / DESCRIPTION for these reasons: > > - it's not parameterized, and I think you don't want to repeat the > @Meta(...) for every rule, you just want the argument > - you can use only one I column, since the 2nd one silently overwrites > the 1st one, so you'll have to squeeze multiple @s into one cell > - it is an undocumented feature, and the name would suggest that it was > intended for providing a comment > > Adding a proper metadata column type is simple, given what is available > from other column types. > > -W > > 2011/1/10 Tihomir Surdilovic <[email protected]> > >> Hi Jason, >> for fact types and attributes you should be able to reuse the Functions >> keyword in the RuleSet section of your sheet, for example: >> >> ----------------------------------------------- >> | Functions | declare Person @author( Bob ) ......... end | >> ----------------------------------------------- >> >> For rule attributes you can reuse the "I" keyword as the cell header and >> add the attributes, for example: >> >> ------------------------------------------------- >> |RuleTable Sample| >> | | >> ------------------------------------------------- >> | Condition | I | >> Action | >> ------------------------------------------------- >> | $p : Person | | >> | >> ------------------------------------------------- >> | name==$param| | >> | >> ------------------------------------------------- >> | SomeName | @author( Bob ) | System.out..... | >> ------------------------------------------------- >> >> Neither are optimal, but just workarounds. If you raise a Jira, I can put >> on todo list. >> Hope this helps. >> >> Thanks. >> Tihomir >> >> On 1/7/11 9:35 PM, Jason Mihalick wrote: >> >> Tihomir, Do you know if decision tables support >> metadata<http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/5.1.1.34858.FINAL/drools-expert/html_single/index.html#d0e3368>? >> >> ------------------------------ >> View this message in context: Re: Need help with Decision Table >> Conditions<http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Need-help-with-Decision-Table-Conditions-tp2195003p2215160.html> >> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list >> archive<http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-User-f47000.html>at >> Nabble.com. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing >> [email protected]https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing > [email protected]https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
