Yes, the accumulate function itself should maintain the sort internally. @OlliSee : See the thread titled "How to write a rule that fires when it matches against specific facts in working memory." --- On Sun, 1/30/11, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Writing a pattern in which each event constraint depends on the previous event To: "Rules Users List" <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011, 10:25 AM On 30 January 2011 12:55, OlliSee <[email protected]> wrote: @Wolfgang: I guess you are referring to the list I use. Of course I expect them to be ordered by timestamp. You sure do, but the question is whether you get them in this order during processing by accumulate. There is no documentation that accumulate passes through a set of selected facts in the order they were inserted. It could just as well be the (random) order of some hash key, or reverse, or whatever. -W -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Writing-a-pattern-in-which-each-event-constraint-depends-on-the-previous-event-tp2370165p2383235.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
