Hi Wolfgang, Many thanks again for your response (I very much appreciate your comprehensive replies to my questions, it is helping me get a clearer idea of what is possible with Drools and the best approach to architecting applications using it). It is a shame that Fact Templates have not been more comprehensively incorporated into the Type Declaration mechanism.
Thanks, James -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Dynamic-Fact-Types-tp2462037p2466067.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
