The suggestion of placing the type declarations in the template worked. However I am eager to find a solution where they can be defined independently without exhibiting the bug mentioned earlier in the thread?
Thanks, James -- View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Declaring-events-separately-from-rules-breaks-expires-tp1792611p2491880.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
