Hi there, Davide Sotara a.k.a. sotty in the IRC channel was working on that side of the project. As far as I know he already get it working. Ping him in the channel if you see him online.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Arjun Dhar <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > though it is clear Rule Engine (lke Drools) supports Declarative > programming and First order Logic or FOL (with existential quantifiers and > works) .... am also looking for Probabilistic Reasoning. > > Example: > Fact: A U B => C; this fact exists with a probability of 0.9. > Principles namely being: Locality, Detachment, Truth functionality (i.e. > when predicates in facts are not mutually exclusive then probabilistic > calculations are not as simple as Boolean operations) etc. > > Has such theory been worked into Drools yet or are there any plans for the > future? > I'd assume the same concepts can be used on Fuzzy rules and fuzzy sets. > > Am sure these are practical issues that at some point the Drools team would > have thought about. Whats the direction on this? > > thanks > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Support-for-Probabilistic-reasoning-FOL-tp2810931p2810931.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
