Why do you need the and in the rule?
Have you tried
> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
> salience 50
> when
def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1)
EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1)
$param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
then
$param.setEnabled(true);
update($param);
end
Thomas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rules-users-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Waclaw Borowiec
> Sent: 05 October 2011 10:55
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [rules-users] Compilation errors with 5.3.0.CR1
>
> Hello
>
> I'm sending the message once again due to problems with code samples
> visibility in the previous one.
>
> I've got following rule:
>
> rule "enabled paramId: 1, id: 0"
> salience 50
> when
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
> $param : EmParamValue(id == 1, enabled == false)
> not ParentDisabled(id == 1)
> then
> $param.setEnabled(true);
> update($param);
> end>
>
> It compiles fine under Drools 5.1.1, but after switching to 5.3.0.CR1 I get
> following exception:
>
> [Error: unexpected end of statement]
> [Near : {... def ....}]
> ^
> [Line: 1, Column: 4]
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser._captureBlock(AbstractParser.java:1470)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.captureCodeBlock(AbstractParser.java:14
> 46)
> at org.mvel2.compiler.AbstractParser.nextToken(AbstractParser.java:421)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler._compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:1
> 28)
> at
> org.mvel2.compiler.ExpressionCompiler.compile(ExpressionCompiler.java:62
> )
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:668)
> at org.mvel2.MVEL.analysisCompile(MVEL.java:672)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.setInputs(PatternBuilder.java:854)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:595)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.processConstraintsAndBinds(PatternB
> uilder.java:397)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:309)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.PatternBuilder.build(PatternBuilder.java:132)
> at
> org.drools.rule.builder.GroupElementBuilder.build(GroupElementBuilder.jav
> a:65)
> at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuilder.build(RuleBuilder.java:80)
> at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:2241)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:802)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java
> :388)
> at
> org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder
> .java:566)
> at
> org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.ja
> va:35)
> at
> com.proximetry.elmgr.services.DependenciesBean$Expander.addDrl(Depen
> denciesBean.java:110)
>
>
> It is
>
> (def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> line that causes the problem - the exeption disappears after removing it.
> What's interesting, when I add '$' sign to binding variable name, and the line
> looks like:
>
> ($def0: EmParamDefinition(paramName == "p2", listIndex == -1) and
> EmParamValue(paramDefinitionId == $def0, requiredValue == 1))
>
>
> instead of the exception I get DRL error:
>
> [DialectError message='Unable to wire compiled classes, probably related to
> compilation failures:sun.reflect.generics.reflectiveObjects.WildcardTypeImpl
> cannot be cast to java.lang.Class']
>
>
> For completness, this is how I add DRL resources:
>
> public void addDrl(Reader rdr) {
> KnowledgeBuilder kBuilder =
> KnowledgeBuilderFactory.newKnowledgeBuilder();
>
> kBuilder.add( ResourceFactory.newReaderResource(rdr),
> ResourceType.DRL);
> if( kBuilder.hasErrors() ){
> for( KnowledgeBuilderError err: kBuilder.getErrors() ){
> StackTrace.error(this, err);
> }
> throw new IllegalStateException( "DRL errors" );
> }
> knowledgeBase.addKnowledgePackages(
> kBuilder.getKnowledgePackages() );
> }
>
>
> I would be grateful if someone has an idea, why after switching Drools
> version such problem exists.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have
received this message in error, please immediately notify the
[email protected] and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The
content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for
employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not
print this e-mail unless necessary.
NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX,
United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no.
3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
