You need to analyze if you can handle 100k objects creation per second in java first.. I think that will be the first bottle neck :)
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:16 PM, slyfox <bobby.richa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you both, that helps a lot. So fusion really helps to just manage > the > lifetime of a fact? > > I am trying to migrate my hand coding trading and analysis application to > drools. > > I think it will work fine for currencies, perhaps only 100 messages per > second, but I am worried about equity options data which could be 100k+ > messages a second. > > Do you guys have any tips or trick for dealing with that amount of data, > like a messages per second to rule ratio? Granted I know that is arbitrary > because its based on the rule complexity. But perhaps simple two - three > line basic rules. Is it even possible to answer this? > > Are there any metrics on the capabilities of drools for high message, high > rule count scenarios? > > Thanks again. > Bobby > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Fusion-appears-to-be-working-properly-but-tp3420043p3421986.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- - CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com - MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com - Co-Founder @ http://www.jugargentina.org - Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar - Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
