Swindells, Thomas wrote: > > Can you split it into two separate diverges? > Diverge to B first and always follow the other path which then does the A > & C, > Similarly at the other end wait for A &C and then a second wait to add in > the condition for B. > > Thomas >
I am not sure I entirely follow your suggestion. A, B, & C could fire in any combination, but always at least one. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Rule-Flow-Diverge-Converge-Issue-with-one-to-many-paths-being-exected-tp3493775p3493884.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
