The fundamental idea is to use a DSL for LHS and RHS coding. That said: if a DSLR line does not match one of your DSL phrases, how do you tell a misspelled DSLR line from a Java line?
And there's the possibility of using > as an indication for Java. -W On 12/12/2011, ronalbury <[email protected]> wrote: > Laune > > I was hoping that DSL was like a regex-based macro-substitution system ... > expanding only where it found matches. I don't believe this is an RHS vs > LHS issue ... the question is whether using DSL for one particular situation > should require you to use DSL for everything. > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Can-I-put-java-code-in-dslr-file-tp3578376p3580086.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
