> Concerning #3: There is no need to avoid a logical disjunction of > two constraints within a single pattern. It's only a disjunction of > patterns that results in a rule split, which may cause surprising > results.
Ah. That was a distinction I hadn't caught on to, though it's pretty obvious to me now that I think about it. I will just go that route then; it results in much more readable code. Thanks. Mike _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
