OK, thanks for the confirmation. Do you have any comments w.r.t. to usability during development (debugging?!) and maintenance? The example is simple enough, but what's your feeling?
-W On 6 January 2012 08:46, FrankVhh <[email protected]> wrote: > > laune wrote > > > > What I suggested is a non-standard way of rule authoring, and I just > think > > that it is possible - I've never tried it. > > > > This should work. I tried it once with Drools 5.0, so I assume it is still > OK. > > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n3637269/voc.dsl voc.dsl > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n3637269/Sample.dst Sample.dst > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/file/n3637269/DroolsTest.java > DroolsTest.java > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Template-Key-in-DSL-tp3634710p3637269.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
