2012/2/10 Apache <[email protected]> > Hey, > I am trying to get multiple threads to insert events and run rules against > the union of events inserted ( an as soon as they are inserted, a timer > drools thread kicking of fireallrules() is not an option because that would > introduce a delay ) and wanted some opinion on the following: > > 1. Stateless session is basically a wrapper around statefulsession and > since per doc statefulsession is not threadsafe
>From where did you learn this? -W > is it safe to assume 2 threads cannot insert and run fireallrules to > compare against a union of objects inserted by multiple threads without > some synchronication on event insertion and ESP fireallrulesrules ? ( would > the answer still hold despite a drools-camel endpoint reading and storing > exchanges from multiple threads ? ) > > 2. If in the above point we simplify the case where the rule uses the > "from" keyword and reads from a cache or a Db ( is reading from > A cache supported out of the box ? ) then will drools bhaviour will be > bound by the thread which invokes fireallrules() ? > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
