> > > Hi Anton, > I'm (un)officially in charge of the topic. Right now I have identified the > following topics/tasks, feel free to ask for more details on any one of > them: > > 1) Use the ontology to create a fact model to write rules with : I'm > perfecting the tool even now, in a few days the alpha version will be > available for testing. > It's meant to be pretty flexible, support many persistency techniques, > provide convenience methods and will be integrated with the recent > "traiting" (dynamic typing) technique. > It makes some (reasonable) assumptions on the ontology, and would need use > cases and consolidations. > > 1b) Once the fact model is there, we'd have to instantiate the individuals > in the ontology as facts > 1c) We have a side project to make this compatible with guvnor, to edit > "semantically constrained" rules. > > 2) Use the definitions in the ontology to create classification rules. > Would > be "rule-style", in close world assumptions. My feeling is that it would > create an execution framework for a SPIN-like language (or, if you prefer, > a > DRL version of the SPIN framework). > I haven't started it yet, but could be done in a relatively few days > > 3) Use the definitions in the ontology to create a rule-based, > object-oriented semantic reasoner. A proof of concept for a fuzzy semantic > reasoner exists, but that definitely is on the TODO list. Help, as always, > is appreciated :) > This would be a necessary complement to the fact model, to ensure it's kept > consistent with the ontology. > > > Hi Davide
Thanks, the work youre doing sounds really exciting and promising! I would very much like to follow your progress, and, if I can, help out. What is the best way to follow the progress of this project? Kind regards, Anton
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
