Sorry for the confusion, of course I mean ACTION. Although I still did not try it, I also get from the documentation that you would need a column header. The way I see it, there are multiple workarounds for that. One more ugly than the other, so it's up to you to decide if it's worth it.
1) As you said, append all helper columns to the right of the actual decision table. 2) Hide all of the real decision table and create a complete "helper table" that will feed the real decision table. 3) Mark your helper action column as ACTION as well, if the column is filled in, it will generate a colon ";". I seem to remember having an excel function in the decision table without any problems. Regards, Frank laune wrote > > > I guess you mean ACTION. > > I haven't tried it either, but I'd think that the API accessing the > spreadsheet would have to return the formula rather than the value > computed from it. > > And, IIRC, if the additional columns aren't headed with one of > CONDITION, ACTION,... they'd stop access by the spreadsheet parser. So > they would have to be the rightmost columns, which might not be > convenient in general. > > -W > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-Decision-Table-multiple-actions-accumulation-tp4017733p4017744.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
