Hi I THINK this interpretations can use :
1) Using a BP ontology as a meta-model of BPs, so that BPMN processes would be recognized as instances of the concepts defined in that ontology. You can then "reason" over the precesses themselves. 2012/6/22 Davide Sottara <dso...@gmail.com> > Hi Olfa, > sorry, I've been travelling in the last 3 weeks, I'll answer your emails > shortly after. > Now, for a general, public answer: "integrating business processes and > ontologies" is a very broad question... > Some possible interpretations include: > > 1) Using a BP ontology as a meta-model of BPs, so that BPMN processes would > be recognized as instances of the concepts defined in that ontology. You > can > then "reason" over the precesses themselves. > 2) Using a BP to orchestrate "Semantic Web Services" > 3) Using the ontology as a data/domain model, shared between the tasks, to > exchange information > 4) Use a BP to express the transformations to be applied to a set of data > defined in an ontology > 5) Any combination of the above and more... > > you can google up a number of papers, reports, standards, works etc for any > of them and possibly more > JBPM people, feel free to pick up the lines ;) > Best > Davide > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-JBPM-ontology-tp4018187p4018194.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users