laune, thanks for the quick response.
laune wrote
>> $supportFT: supportFT(value == null || value !=null)
>> condFT(value == $supportFT.getValue())
>> $conclusion: testInferred()
>>
>
> This could be due to a misuse, e.g., a change of a fact without
> update/modify.
see the drl- it is only changed by using 'modify'.
laune wrote
>> $supportFT: supportFT()
>> supportFT(value == $condFt.getValue())
>> $conclusion: testInferred()
>>
>
> This is either incomplete or illegal: undeclared $condFt.
See the updated line. This is what i had meant
$condFt: condFt()
supportFT(value == $condFt.getValue())
$conclusion: testInferred()
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Inconsistent-behavior-of-a-rule-tp4021003p4021006.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
